Author: Maëlys McArdle

  • For those here for the IE6 Vulnerability…

    I realise that some of you may be here concerning information about the IE6 Vulnerability that was exposed a few months ago. Unfortunately, with my transition of blogging platforms, I’ve lost the original article + example. My apologies if this inconveniences you in any way. Anywho, you will be able to see a demo of the code in action in the EYNTO Show (as an example of why one should drop IE and switch to FireFox or Opera.)

  • EYNTO Show Editing Progress…

    Here’s what I’ve done editing-wise, and what is left:

    Chapters:
    Chapter 0 – Opening Credits
    Chapter 1 – In-Show Introduction
    Chapter 2 – Firefox vs. Internet Explorer
    Chapter 3 – Firewalls
    Chapter 4 – On-line Transactions
    Chapter 5 – E-Mail
    Chapter 6 – Local Area Network
    Chapter 7 – Anonimity on the Internet
    Chapter 8 – Viruses/Spyware/Adware
    Chapter 9 – 2600 Meeting & Tips
    Chapter 10 – Downloading (HTTP, FTP, IRC, Newsgroups, Bittorrent, ed2k, KazAa)
    Chapter 11 – Downloaded Material Types
    Chapter 12 – Using Downloaded Materials: Movies
    Chapter 13 – Using Downloaded Materials: Software
    Chapter 14 – Ripping DVDs
    Chapter 15 – Upgrading your Computer
    Chapter 16 – Windows Tips

    I’ve finished up to Chapter 5. This is an extremely time consuming process, as the editing process is about 3 hours to every minute of final footage. Why so long? Mostly because I jam-pack the whole show with home-made animations (frame-by-frame… very lengthy process) as well as tons of visual spice to keep the interest flowing.

    I’m trying to keep the entire production legal, though there has been one hassle with a piece of music whereby the people liscencing it have stated that I would not be able to liscence the music for any fee. So I am going a less-than-legal route, but that said: there is not a fully legal route! The soundtrack I’m going to use is music under the Creative Commons from Falik. Excellent musician by the way that you should check out!

    I don’t wish to divulge more as I want to keep the show a surprise. However, those waiting will have to wait a little more. Its taken me 2 weeks to get but these 6 chapters done, and I have much to go. That said, I’ll keep working on it and we’ll see what happens.

  • Welcome (Again!)

    Well I decided with the upcomming release of the EYNTO Show that it was time to update this site as well. I do plan on getting the show Slashdotted, as others have done, as an ultra-cheap technique to get some extra audience, so I figured I better make this place look better too. :p That and of course rid myself of the many bugs that plagued the previous blogging PHP tool that I was using.

    Anywho, hope you enjoy the new look!

  • Life Updates…

    A few updates today:

    RESUME: Updated my CV.

    EYNTO: Went out today to film the rest of the away-from-home footage for the show. However, as it was extremely cold at at least -20C, opted to film the rest another day. Tomorrow is the first Friday of the month, which means a 2600 Hacker Meeting (or script-kiddie… we’ll see how the crowd is). I’ll go and see if I can get a few people to tip our viewers on general safety practices.

  • Music labels seek higher download prices

    Some leading music labels are in talks with online retailers to raise wholesale prices for digital music downloads, in an attempt to capitalize on burgeoning demand for legal online music.

    The moves, which suggest that the labels want a bigger slice in the fledgling market’s spoils, has angered Steve Jobs, the Apple Computer chief executive who is behind the popular iTunes online music store.

    But music executives expressed caution about their ability to push through unilateral price increases. Among the biggest groups, Universal Music and Sony BMG are known to be particularly reluctant to disrupt the market for downloads. One top label said it would not raise wholesale prices now because the market was not yet mature enough for a price increase.

    Because raising the cost to $30CDN for low-quality restricted music files that only play on select computers will motivate people. Riiight. The labels that make up the RIAA should really get it into their heads that paying $30 for a CD is bloody expensive as is, and that paying $30 for what essentially broils down to something much worse than a CD will not make people wish to purchase it. Rather, they’ll opt for an alternative. Any alternative: be it piracy or otherwise.

    I swear: the music industry could be better managed by brain-dead monkeys.

    Full Article.

    *UPDATE* *UPDATE* *UPDATE* *UPDATE*

    The East Carolinian newspaper has an article on the RIAA’s fight for justice in its war against piracy. I replied the following to the article:

    Well, I do believe that the piracy situation is only as a consequence of the RIAA’s own actions.

    People don’t want to spend $20 on a CD that they may or may not enjoy. But how are they to taste test this music? The radio? Most radio networks play over the same 5 songs repeatedly over a 24 hour period. Television (ie. MTV)? They only stick to mainstream. That’s fine if I enjoy Brittany Spears, less so if I wish to hear a newcomer Jazz artist. So how am I to try the music? Via friends and their personal collections? They may have some CDs of interest, but I like different music than they do. And I am not going to spend a day’s pay on a shiny new disc that could potentially be crap.

    So what do I do? I download it. I listen to it. If I like it, I buy it. That’s how I’ve come to buy all the CDs and concert DVDs currently in my possession.

    But beyond that, the RIAA is continually shooting themselves in the foot. The Internet. Its a new business platform. And what do they do? They charge incredibly high royalties on legal P2P alternatives! This is for music files that are low-quality, DRMed (ie. plays only on certain computers under the right conditions… will not work in a few years), and a pain to deal with. And yet the labels the RIAA represents want to hike the price? Oy vey! Charging $18 for a downloaded album, which costs $0 to replicate and distribute, and that is limited in both quality and flexibility of use. Talk about a good dynamic.

    I have little respect for the RIAA, as you can see. Don’t get me wrong: I love the artists. But I hate being ripped off. If I want to steal music, I’ll rob a bank first and then go buy the CDs at the store… After all, the RIAA lobbyed itself so well within the justice system that the penalties for me robbing a bank are less worse than me downloading one music file.

    Way to go RIAA!

    Julien McArdle